Skip to main content

Film Review: "A Wrinkle in Time"

Image result for a wrinkle in time
     
            Director Ava Duvernay is back, this time helming Disney’s live-action adaptation of Madeleine L’Engle’s book, A Wrinkle in Time.The famed director made history with this film when she became the first female African-American director to helm a live-action film with a budget of over $100 million and only the third female director overall to achieve that budget. The film boasts an impressive cast that includes Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, Mindy Kaling, Chris Pine and is led by Storm Reid.
The film starts off with a short scene in which a young Meg (Reid) is spending time with her dad, Dr. Alex Murry (Pine). The film then jumps ahead to the present day where the four-year anniversary of Dr. Murry’s mysterious disappearance approaches. The first act moves quickly and it hastily portrays Meg as an outkast struggling to understand why her father left her family. Her 6-year-old genius brother (Deric McCabe) doesn’t help matters, as he can be a lot to handle for those around him. Before long, Meg meets Mrs. Whatsit (Witherspoon), Mrs. Who (Kaling) and Mrs. Which (Winfrey) and they embark on a fantastical journey across the universe to search for Dr. Murry.
A Wrinkle in Time is undeniably gorgeous to look at. The colors are fun, vibrant and are essential to help make the various worlds that the characters visit feel real. It’s not just the colors, however. The designs of everything from the terrain of the worlds to the way the creatures look was flawlessly and beautifully executed. There are so many frames within this film that will take your breath away with how wonderfully made they are. When it comes to the film’s visuals, there are no complaints.
Unfortunately, great visuals alone don’t make a great film. A Wrinkle in Time suffers from many things, one being its runtime. The film is under two hours long which feels awfully short for a film that has so many complicated themes and ideas (i.e. traveling through time and space). As the film progresses, you can get a sense that there are things that aren’t there, but they should be. Too often, A Wrinkle in Time feels like a compilation of random moments loosely tied together by this goal of finding Dr. Murry. It felt as if they wanted to include as many elements from the book as possible to make fans happy, but in doing so, they denied themselves the opportunity to fully develop the things that really mattered. They go through all these worlds but only spend a few minutes in each and it all ends up looking like a highlight reel of what this film could have been.
It is frustrating to see such a talented cast have nothing to do. All of the performances were fine, and I truly believe that the actors did what they could with what they were given, but it’s a shame that what they were given wasn’t good enough. Take Meg’s mother (Gugu Mbatha-Raw), for example. She is supposed to be this brilliant scientist, and we get glimpses of that but not nearly enough. It could have been especially inspiring for young girls to see her really be a scientist, to see that they are also capable of achieving that, and yet we hardly see her do anything scientific. This is the case with most the characters. You get a crash course of what they are supposed to be, but you don’t ever get to know them.
Ava Duvernay deserves all the credit in the world for doing what she did with the material she was given. One can only hope that this doesn’t deter studios from giving her big films because her talent is undeniable. Unfortunately, for all of its good intentions, A Wrinkle in Time ultimately falls short of being a great film. Ava took on a project that appears to be incredibly difficult to properly bring to the big screen and ended up making a beautiful mess.

A Wrinkle in Time sits at a 50% for me. There is some good, but also plenty of bad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Movie Monday: John Carpenter's "Halloween" vs Rob Zombie's "Halloween"

            We live in an era where remakes and sequels of beloved films are constantly coming out. Every once in a while, a classic or a highly popular film gets remade and it turns out so bad that people claim it “ruined the original”. One such case is Rob Zombie’s remake of John Carpenter’s 1978 horror classic, Halloween. The purpose of this article is twofold. As always, I want to encourage readers to watch a classic film. With this article, however, I also want to try and dispel this notion that bad remakes/sequels ruin the original film.              John Carpenter’s original is widely considered to be a masterpiece and one of the founders of the slasher sub-genre. The story is a relatively simple one. It starts off in Haddonfield, Illinois in 1963 on Halloween night where a 6-year-old Michael Myers kills his older sister shortly after she has finished having ...

Five Things from the Film Industry I'm Thankful For this Thanksgiving

 1. Pixar's Coco I can't overstate how much this film meant to me. To finally be able to see my culture being represented on the big screen in an accurate and loving way was overwhelming in the best way possible. I've seen this film twice now and both times I was overcome with a sense of pride at seeing a film being able to perfectly capture the essence of Mexican culture. Every single aspect of this film, from the behaviors to the music, was treated with dignity and respect. I didn't realize how much this film would affect me, but I'm thankful that Coco was made and that it is getting the amount of love that it is. In my eyes, this is the best Pixar film ever made. 2. Horror is Killing it This Year Horror has always been my favorite genre in film and to see how hugely successful horror movies were this year has been awesome. Films like It and Get Out made huge amounts of money, but more importantly, they were excellent films that people wanted to see over a...

Film Review: Marvel's "Ant-Man"

Image via Forbes.com It would be a lie to sit here and pretend like I have been an Ant-Man fan my entire life. The truth is that I didn't bother learning much about him until a few years ago. You see, in 2012's San Diego Comic Con, Marvel showed a one-minute long video which turned out to be the test footage for this film. There was no dialogue nor any sort of story to it, but that didn't matter because what we saw was unlike anything we had seen before. My interest in this unknown superhero was sparked that night and while many people mocked this film leading up its release, I kept telling people that this movie was going to surprise everyone. What I saw in that footage was so much potential, and then adding the incredible cast elevated my enthusiasm even more. But now that I have seen the movie, I have to say that even I was surprised by the final product, and I couldn't be more thrilled about it. ***WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD*** Ant-Man  opens up with some ...