Skip to main content

Film Review: "Ready Player One"

Image result for ready player one
There aren’t very many directors who have had quite the career that Steven Spielberg has. The man who directed the very first blockbuster in Jaws, is the same man who has put together some of our most beloved films such as the E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, Jurassic Park, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and the Indiana Jones series. It’s the same man that, aside from giving us these wonderfully imaginative films, has also given us hard-hitting dramas such as Schindler’s List, Lincoln and Bridge of Spies. His career has spanned 50 years, and the 71-year-old director shows no signs of slowing down. With his latest film, Ready Player One, Spielberg once again delivers an awe-inspiring film that captures the wonders of the imagination. It stars Tye Sheridan as Wade Watts/Parzival, Olivia Cooke as Samantha Cook/Art3mis, Ben Mendelsohn as the villainous Sorrento and Mark Rylance as OASIS creator James Halliday.
The film takes place in 2045 Columbus, Ohio. In this futuristic setting, the world has become highly overpopulated, corrupt and polluted, and as a result most major cities have become slum-like areas. In order to escape the hopelessness of life, people participate in a virtual reality world known as the OASIS. However, when OASIS creator James Halliday dies, he reveals that he has hidden an “easter egg” somewhere in the game and whoever finds will become the new owner of the OASIS. This leads us to Wade, a teenage orphan living with his aunt in one of the slums. He, along with his best friend Aech and newfound friend Art3mis, must figure where the “easter egg” is in order to stop the evil corporation IOI from taking over the OASIS.
If you know anything about Ready Player One, it’s probably that it is filled to the brim with references to classic games and movies. In film, cameos can be a little tricky to pull off properly. They have to appear natural and be done in a way that doesn’t pull the audience out of the film. A bad cameo sticks out like a sore thumb and can taint the overall experience of the movie itself. One of the big concerns going into this film was how it would handle so many different cameos without making them feel odd or out-of-place. Ready Player One does such a wonderful job in fleshing out its virtual reality world that seeing Chucky or the Battletoads walking around seems as normal as seeing any other human walking down the street. If you are at all concerned about how that is handled, you shouldn’t be.
Ready Player One is so much more than just an excuse to celebrate geekdom, however. At its core, Ready Player One is about learning to live in the moment. It’s about the importance of making real connections with people and not getting lost in the things that don’t matter. Its positivity and upbeat nature is so incredibly infectious that you may find yourself smiling with joy at random moments of the film. Whether you know all of the characters and objects cameoing in this film or none of them, that is ultimately irrelevant because they are not the things that make-or-break this film. This film is as great as it is because of its incredible cast, its ability to effortlessly switch between live-action and animation and its wonderfully imaginative story. If this film were 10-15 minutes shorter, it would be perfect.        
It would be unfair to say that Steven Spielberg is back, because he never really left. He is, after all, coming off of directing a Best Picture nominee in The Post. Still, Ready Player One captures the imagination in a way that Spielberg’s older films such as Raiders of the Lost Ark or E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial did, something that Spielberg films haven’t really done in recent years. Ready Player One is filled with a sense of youthful exuberance, almost as if this film allowed Spielberg to turn back the clock and be a kid again. When you see this film, it might have the same effect on you.


My Score: 95%

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Classic Movie Monday: John Carpenter's "Halloween" vs Rob Zombie's "Halloween"

            We live in an era where remakes and sequels of beloved films are constantly coming out. Every once in a while, a classic or a highly popular film gets remade and it turns out so bad that people claim it “ruined the original”. One such case is Rob Zombie’s remake of John Carpenter’s 1978 horror classic, Halloween. The purpose of this article is twofold. As always, I want to encourage readers to watch a classic film. With this article, however, I also want to try and dispel this notion that bad remakes/sequels ruin the original film.              John Carpenter’s original is widely considered to be a masterpiece and one of the founders of the slasher sub-genre. The story is a relatively simple one. It starts off in Haddonfield, Illinois in 1963 on Halloween night where a 6-year-old Michael Myers kills his older sister shortly after she has finished having ...

A Remake of 1922's "Nosferatu" Is On Its Way

Image via Reddit It has been announced that a remake of F. W. Murnau's 1922 horror film, Nosferatu , is in the works. For those who are unaware of what Nosferatu is, it is essentially the story of Dracula except that the characters have different names because the studio was not able to get the rights to the novel. The silent film, despite being almost a century old, is widely considered one of the best horror movies of all time, ranking 3rd amongst Rotten Tomatoes' "Top 100 Horror Movies". What excites me about this film being remade is that it signals a return to what vampires are meant to be, which is terrifying monsters. In the past 10 years, there hasn't really been a good incarnation of any of the classic horror monsters (Dracula, Frankenstein, the Werewolf, etc.). In my eyes, the best vampire movie in recent years was 2007's 30 Days of Night, but it does not relate to Dracula and doesn't even mention the word "vampire" throughout the...

New "Ant-Man" Poster Has Been Released!

Image via Bing Images Marvel has released a new poster for the upcoming "Ant-Man" movie and while it's not a breathtaking poster, it is still pretty cool. You can see all of the main characters from the movie, including Michael Douglas as Hank Pym, Evangeline Lilly as Hope Van Dyne, and Corey Stoll as the villain Darren Cross (aka Yellowjacket). We can also see Paul Rudd as both Scott Lang and his superhero alter-ego, Ant-Man. If you look closely at the Marvel sign you will see a miniature version of our hero, which I thought was a pretty neat thing to add. Also, the city and helicopters in the background do a great job at highlighting the theme that this movie will carry, which is that of a heist film. Overall, it's the type of poster we have come to expect from Marvel movies, but that is not necessarily a bad thing.